Beyond the Oriental Revolt

21. March, 2011

With the Arabic revolt, the sleepy eyes of the western spectator are opened to the Middle East again. After removing some desert sand from the western eye, an Orient emerges beyond the Israel-Palestine conflict and the 1001 nights of Muslim terror. In a rush, journalists have to create new images of the Middle East. The caricatural mask suddenly has come alive, and from under the mask a pale face appears. A face so pale that the West hurriedly puts a new mask on it. Now, it is less that of an area prone to Muslim terrorism, but rather of one destined for revolutions against despotic dictators.
To focus solely on “the Oriental revolt” as an explanation of what is currently happening in the Middle East does injustice to the obvious truth. A truth that nonetheless is completely overlooked. This truth is not about a wave of revolutions, nor of a domino effect, but it is about a multi-variety of revolutions, demonstrations, civil wars and simple civil discontent that fills the squares, roundabouts and streets of the Middle East. The new revolutionary blanket that is hastily spread over the Middle East moreover serves to keep the shifting power relations that are taking place in the Middle East out of sight.
These shifts are part of a development in which the particular preferential and perverted role the West has played in the Middle East for so long is renegotiated, without the West being present at the table.Illustrative of the decline of western power in the region is how the West is losing its power to define the Middle East in the international media. Institutions like CNN and the BCC have grown dependent on locals and on their regional competitors Al Jazeera and Al Arabia, for footage. With this development in media it is literally no longer the West that ‘creates the image’ of the Oriental Revolt, but rather the people of the Middle East themselves. In this respect, the revolt is detaching the region further from its special relationship with the West. Moreover, western media coverage on the Oriental Revolt, from Yemen to Syria and Iran to Morocco, shows a disconnect between the sudden need to cover the events springing up everywhere, and a necessary understanding of the situation on the ground in the different Middle Eastern localities.

It is important to realize that the coverage of the current Oriental Revolt only shows very little of the ‘real’ Middle Eastern reality and that it particularly neglects the differences between the societies that make up this region. Although the disgruntlement of today’s protesters and revolutionaries seems completely justified, one cannot assume, as western media tends to, that all protests are “good” or that the public uprisings are all similar in kind. The politics behind the current developments in the Middle East is far too complicated to generalize events into an ‘Arab’ or ‘Oriental’ Revolt. An understanding of the social structures and subtle particularities of the different societies is necessary to make a good judgment. It is exactly this balanced understanding that is lost in western coverage of the recent developments in the Middle East.

The idea of an ‘Oriental Revolt’ therefore stems not only from the changing political equilibrium of the localities that form ‘the Middle East’, but more from the misconception that these belong to a modern age in which thought, identity and action are supposedly aligned according to strict western dogma. After communism collapsed with the Berlin Wall in 1989 and capitalism stopped working as smoothly as it should have during the recent global economic crisis, the western orientalist image of the Middle East now finds its Waterloo at Tahrir Square in Cairo, the souq of Tunis, the desert of Libya, on a roundabout in Bahrain and all those other places where Arabs live their lives away from the spotlight.

The explosions on the surface of the Middle East are merely warning signs of the new power equilibriums that are yet to be formed in times to come. In terms of wellbeing, freedom and prosperity these are difficult times to predict anything, anywhere. Therefore the dream of a bright future that is fuelling the revolts of today is far from a reality for the majority of the Middle Easterners of tomorrow. Nonetheless, it seems likely that these revolts have started a new period of independence, maybe more from the West, than from the leaders the people are fighting to topple.

Ruben Elsinga took his MSc. in International Relations at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). He has lived in Damascus, Syria for one and a half years, where he worked at the Netherlands Institute of Academic Studies.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s